UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒ Definitive Proxy Statement

☐ Definitive Additional Materials

☐ Soliciting Material under Section 240.14a-12

EASTERLY GOVERNMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

☒ No fee required.

☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐ Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

to be held on May 2, 2023

Dear Stockholder:

You are invited to attend the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders of Easterly Government Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, which will be held on Tuesday, May 2, 2023, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at 2001 K Street, NW, Suite 775 North, Washington, D.C. 20006. The annual meeting will be held for the following purposes:

In addition, stockholders may be asked to consider and vote upon any other matters that may properly be brought before the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Any action may be taken on the foregoing matters at the annual meeting on the date specified above, or on any date or dates to which the annual meeting may be adjourned, or to which the annual meeting may be postponed.

Our Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 22, 2023 as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The proxy statement and proxy card are being mailed to you on or about April 4, 2023.

Washington, D.C.

April 4, 2023

Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card or authorize your proxy by telephone or the Internet. For specific instructions on voting, please refer to the instructions on the proxy card or the information forwarded by your broker, bank or other holder of record. If you attend the annual meeting, you may vote in person if you wish, even if you have previously returned your proxy card. Please note that if your shares are held of record by a bank, broker or other nominee and you wish to vote in person at the annual meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from such bank, broker or other nominee.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 2, 2023. The Proxy Statement and our 2022 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at: http://www.viewproxy.com/easterlygvtprop/2023.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EASTERLY GOVERNMENT PROPERTIES, INC.

2001 K Street, NW, Suite 775 NORTH

Washington, D.C. 20006

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR OUR 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

to be held on May 2, 2023

We are sending these proxy materials to our stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors, or the Board, of Easterly Government Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, for use at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Tuesday, May 2, 2023, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at 2001 K Street, NW, Suite 775 North, Washington, D.C. 20006, or at any postponement or adjournment of the annual meeting.

References in this proxy statement to “we,” “us,” “our,” “ours,” and the “Company” refer to Easterly Government Properties, Inc., unless the context otherwise requires. This proxy statement and a form of proxy have been made available to our stockholders on the Internet and will be mailed to stockholders on or about April 4, 2023.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?

Holders of record of our common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at the close of business on March 22, 2023, the record date for the annual meeting, are entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote at the annual meeting. If you are a holder of record of our common stock as of the record date, you may vote the shares that you held on the record date even if you sell such shares after the record date. Each outstanding share as of the record date entitles its holder to cast one vote for each matter to be voted upon and, with respect to the election of directors, one vote for each director to be elected. Stockholders do not have the right to cumulate voting for the election of directors.

What is the purpose of the annual meeting?

At the annual meeting, you will be asked to vote on the following proposals:

You also may be asked to consider and act upon any other matters that may properly be brought before the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of the total number of outstanding shares entitled to vote at the annual meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business at the annual meeting. As of the record date, there were 91,978,720 shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.

Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote on each matter properly submitted at the annual meeting and, with respect to the election of directors, one vote for each director to be elected. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (defined below) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business at the annual meeting.

1

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

In respect of Proposal 1, a director nominee is elected if he or she receives more votes for his or her election than votes against his or her election. Under our Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Guidelines, any incumbent director who fails to be elected by a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election is required to promptly submit to the Board a written offer to resign from the Board. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is required to make a recommendation to the Board with respect to such resignation. The Board is required to take action with respect to the recommendation and to disclose its decision and, if applicable, the Board’s reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation. The policy is described more fully below under the caption “Additional Corporate Governance Matters—Annual Elections; Majority Voting.” With respect to Proposal 1, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the election of directors.

A majority of all of the votes cast at the annual meeting at which a quorum is present is required for approval of each of Proposals 2 and 3. In respect of Proposal 2, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the vote for this proposal. In respect of Proposal 3, abstentions will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the vote for this proposal.

Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy card?

If you cast a vote by proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is voted by:

If you attend the annual meeting, you may vote in person whether or not you previously have given a proxy, but your presence (without further action) at the annual meeting will not constitute revocation of a previously given proxy. Unless you have received a legal proxy to vote the shares, if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, that is, in “street name,” only that bank, broker or other nominee can revoke your proxy on your behalf.

You may revoke a proxy for shares held by a bank, broker or other nominee by submitting new voting instructions to the bank, broker or other nominee or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from the bank, broker or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the annual meeting, by attending the annual meeting and voting in person.

How do I vote?

Voting in Person at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in your own name as a holder of record with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., and attend the annual meeting, you may vote in person at the annual meeting. If your shares are held by a bank, broker or other nominee, that is, in “street name,” and you wish to vote in person at the annual meeting, you will need to obtain a legal proxy from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares of record.

Voting by Proxy. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, the proxy materials were mailed directly to you by us. In that case, you may instruct the proxy holders named in the enclosed proxy card how to vote your shares of common stock in one of the following ways:

Vote online. You can access proxy materials and vote at http://www.viewproxy.com/easterlygvtprop/2023. To vote online, you must have the stockholder identification number provided in the enclosed proxy card.

Vote by telephone. You also have the option to vote by telephone by following the “Vote by Phone” instructions on the enclosed proxy card.

2

Vote by regular mail. If you would like to vote by mail, then please mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it promptly in the postage-paid envelope provided.

Voting by Proxy for Shares Registered in Street Name. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the proxy materials were forwarded to you by that organization. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account. You should instruct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions provided by your broker or nominee.

Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we recommend that you submit a proxy to vote your shares in advance so that your vote will be counted if you later are unable to attend the annual meeting.

How is my vote counted?

If you authorize your proxy to vote your shares electronically via the Internet or by telephone, or, if you properly marked, signed, dated and returned the proxy card mailed to you, the shares that the proxy represents will be voted in the manner specified on the proxy. If you properly signed and returned a proxy card but no specification is made, your shares will be voted “for” the election of the director nominees named in this proxy statement, “for” the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement, and “for” ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. If your shares are held in street name and your broker or nominee does not receive instructions from you about how your shares are to be voted, one of two things can happen, depending on the type of proposal. Pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, rules, if you do not give instructions to your broker or nominee, it will still be able to vote your shares with respect to certain “discretionary” items, but will not be allowed to vote your shares with respect to certain “non-discretionary” items. The ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3) is considered to be a discretionary item under the NYSE rules and your broker or nominee will be able to vote on that item even if it does not receive instructions from you. The election of directors (Proposal 2) and the non-binding, advisory approval of executive compenation (Proposal 2) are considered non-discretionary items. A broker or nominee may not vote your shares with respect to these non-discretionary items if you have not provided instructions. This is called a “broker non-vote.” We strongly encourage you to submit your proxy with instructions and exercise your right to vote as a stockholder.

It is not anticipated that any matters other than those set forth in this proxy statement will be presented at the annual meeting. If other matters are presented, proxies will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders. In addition, since no stockholder nominations or proposals meeting the requirements of Rule 14a-8 or Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act were received, no such matters will be brought to a vote at the annual meeting.

How does the Board recommend that I vote on each of the proposals?

The Board recommends that you vote:

What other information should I review before voting?

Our 2022 Annual Report to Stockholders, or our annual report, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, is being mailed to you concurrently with

3

the mailing of this proxy statement. To access our annual report, go to the “Investor Relations—Financials” page on our website, www.easterlyreit.com, and then click on “Annual Reports.” In addition, documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, are available at a website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Our annual report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K, however, are not part of the proxy solicitation materials, and the information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.

Who is soliciting my proxy?

This solicitation of proxies is made by and on behalf of the Board. We will pay the cost of the solicitation of proxies. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally or by telephone. No arrangements or contracts have been made with any solicitors as of the date of this proxy statement, although we reserve the right to engage solicitors if we deem them necessary. Such solicitations may be made by mail, telephone, facsimile, e-mail or personal interviews.

No person is authorized on our behalf to give any information or to make any representations with respect to the proposals other than the information and the representations contained in this proxy statement, and, if given or made, such information and/or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized.

4

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board currently consists of eight members, each serving for a term of one year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Pursuant to our charter, our directors will be elected annually by our stockholders to serve until the next annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Our bylaws provide that a majority of the entire Board may at any time increase or decrease the number of directors. However, the number of directors may never be less than the minimum number required by the Maryland General Corporation Law, which is one, and, except as set forth in our charter and our bylaws, more than 15.

At the 2023 annual meeting, all of the directors will be elected to serve until the 2024 annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated William C. Trimble, III, Darrell W. Crate, Michael P. Ibe, William H. Binnie, Cynthia A. Fisher, Scott D. Freeman, Emil W. Henry, Jr. and Tara S. Innes to serve as directors. Each of these nominees currently serves as a member of the Board and has consented to being named in this proxy statement. The Board anticipates that each nominee will serve, if elected, as a director. However, if any nominee is unable to accept election, proxies voted in favor of such nominee will be voted for the election of such other person or persons as the Board may select.

Vote Required; Effect of Vote

Under our bylaws, a director nominee in an uncontested election will be elected if he or she receives more votes for his or her election than votes against his or her election. Under our Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Guidelines, any incumbent director who fails to be elected by a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election is required to promptly submit a written offer to resign to the Board. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is required to make a recommendation to the Board with respect to such resignation. The Board is required to take action with respect to the recommendation and to disclose its decision and, if applicable, the Board’s reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation. The policy is described more fully below under the caption “Additional Corporate Governance Matters—Annual Elections; Majority Voting.”

We will treat abstentions and broker non-votes as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on this proposal.

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of its director nominees.

Information Regarding the Director Nominees

The following table and biographical descriptions set forth certain information with respect to each nominee for election as a director at the annual meeting, based upon information furnished by each director. The biographical information includes the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led to the conclusion by the Board that such person should serve as a director.

* We have determined that these directors qualify as “independent” under the standards of the NYSE and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

5

William C. Trimble, III has served as our Chief Executive Officer, President and a director since February 2015. Mr. Trimble co-founded Easterly Partners, LLC and had been its Chief Executive Officer and Managing Partner from August 2011 until our initial public offering completed in February 2015. Prior to joining Easterly Partners, LLC, Mr. Trimble served from April 2009 to August 2011 as the Chief Operating Officer and as a member of the Investment Committee of PRP, LLC, an investment management firm that managed funds that invested in properties leased to the U.S. General Services Administration, or GSA. Mr. Trimble also spent ten years as head of client relations for Red Comb, LLC, a Baltimore, Maryland-based asset management firm specializing in domestic, small capitalization equity securities. Mr. Trimble previously spent five years as head of marketing and a member of the Investment Committee of Winston Capital Management in McLean, Virginia. In 1994, he co-founded the Winston Growth Fund, a long-short equity fund of funds. Mr. Trimble’s board memberships presently include serving as Chairman of the board of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, a global organization supporting general aviation, and as a member of the boards of Bessemer Securities Corporation and The Bessemer Trust Company, N.A. Mr. Trimble earned his MBA and BA from Duke University.

Darrell W. Crate has served as Chairman of the Board since February 2015. Mr. Crate founded Easterly Capital, LLC in 2009 and holds various titles in its related entities. Since 2015, Mr. Crate has been the Managing Principal of Easterly Asset Management (formerly Easterly Partners Group). From 2015 to 2018, Mr. Crate was also the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Easterly Acquisition Corp., a blank check company that combined with Sirius International Insurance Group, a NASDAQ listed company, which subsequently merged with Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. (NYSE: TPRE) in 2020. From 1998 to 2011, Mr. Crate served as the Chief Financial Officer of Affiliated Managers Group (NYSE: AMG), a global asset management holding company. Mr. Crate was previously the Managing Director of the Financial Institutions Group of the Chase Manhattan Corporation based in London and New York, focusing exclusively on investment management firms. Mr. Crate served as Treasurer and on the executive committee of Romney for President during each of the 2008 and 2012 election cycles. Mr. Crate’s board memberships presently include serving as the Vice Chairman of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. Mr. Crate earned his BA from Bates College, where he serves as trustee emeritus, and his MBA from Columbia Business School.

Michael P. Ibe has served as our Executive Vice President—Development and Acquisitions and Vice Chairman of the Board since February 2015. Mr. Ibe co-founded Western Devcon, Inc. in 1987 and has since then served as president, where he has been primarily responsible for all phases of acquisition and development in each endeavor, including build-to-suit GSA-leased properties of Western Devcon, Inc. and its affiliates. His experience related to construction dates back to 1980, when he served as Vice President of Construction at Ibe Investments, a family-owned real estate company specializing in high-density residential developments in Phoenix, Arizona and luxury single-family developments in San Diego, California. From 1970 to 1980, Mr. Ibe served as a contract administrator and later a vice president and general manager, of Lampco Industries, a San Diego, California manufacturer of precision components for jet engines and nuclear reactors. Mr. Ibe attended Mesa College and San Diego State University.

William H. Binnie has served as a director since February 2015 and Lead Independent Director since May 2016. Mr. Binnie has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Carlisle Capital Corporation, a private investment and management company with a focus on media and real estate businesses, since 1996. Mr. Binnie served as Chairman of the board, founder and chief executive officer of Carlisle Plastics, Inc., a NYSE listed company that was a consumer company producing products made from plastic, from 1984 until its acquisition by Tyco International Ltd. in 1996. Mr. Binnie is the Chairman of NH1 News, as well as President of 19 radio stations in the Carlisle Media organization. Mr. Binnie was also a candidate for the U.S. Senate from New Hampshire in 2010. Mr. Binnie earned his MBA from Harvard Business School and his AB from Harvard University and is a former member of the Board of Overseers of Harvard University.

Cynthia A. Fisher has served as a director since February 2015. In 2011, Ms. Fisher founded WaterRev, LLC, an investment company located in Newton, Massachusetts, focused on innovative technology companies that enable sustainable practices of water use. She is an independent investor and consultant to corporate boards and executive management teams. In 1992, Ms. Fisher founded ViaCord, Inc., a cord blood stem cell banking company, and served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ViaCord, Inc. from 1993 to 2000. In 2000, she co-founded ViaCell, Inc., a cellular medicines company, and served as its president and as a member of the board of directors. ViaCell, the successor to ViaCord, went public in 2005 (Nasdaq: VIAC) and was subsequently sold to PerkinElmer

6

(NYSE: PKI) in 2007. Ms. Fisher also serves on the board of directors of another public company, the Boston Beer Company, Inc. (NYSE: SAM), and on the board of directors of several not-for-profit businesses. Ms. Fisher is Founder and Chairman of PatientRightsAdvocate.org focused on price transparency and a functional market in healthcare. She also co-founded and is Chairman of Fitmoney.org which provides curriculum for K-12 financial literacy. Ms. Fisher serves on the board of the National Park Foundation and previously served on the board of directors of Water.org. Ms. Fisher holds an MBA from Harvard Business School and a BS and honorary Doctorate of Science from Ursinus College.

Scott D. Freeman has served as a director since May 2020. Mr. Freeman is Managing Partner of FHR Capital, LLC, a privately held real estate investment and advisory company. Prior to joining FHR Capital in July 2019, Mr. Freeman was with Colony Capital from April 2005 through June 2019 where he was Managing Director and Global Head of Portfolio Management of Colony Capital, Inc. and co-founder of Colony Realty Partners, LLC. Before Colony, he was a Partner and the Director of Acquisitions at TA Associates Realty, LLC from February 1994 to February 2004 where he served on the firm’s Executive Committee and Investment Committee and chaired the Acquisition Committee. Previously, he was an Asset Manager with General Electric Investments and with Aetna Realty Investors. Scott is involved in various volunteer and charitable organizations including serving as a trustee at Bates College. Scott received a BA in Political Science from Bates College and an MBA with concentrations in Real Estate and Finance from the Kellogg School at Northwestern University.

Emil W. Henry, Jr. has served as a director since February 2015. Mr. Henry is a former Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury for Financial Institutions and currently is the Chief Executive Officer of Tiger Infrastructure Partners, a private equity firm he founded that is focused on infrastructure investment opportunities. Prior to founding Tiger Infrastructure Partners in 2009, Mr. Henry was head of the Lehman Brothers Private Equity Infrastructure businesses, where he oversaw infrastructure investments. In 2005, Mr. Henry was appointed Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury for Financial Institutions by the President of the United States. Until his departure in 2007, he was a key advisor to two Treasury secretaries on economic, legislative and regulatory matters affecting U.S. financial institutions and markets. Before joining the U.S. Treasury, Mr. Henry was a partner of Gleacher Partners LLC, an investment banking and investment management firm, where he served as chairman of asset management and managing director, and where he oversaw the firm’s investment activities. Before attending business school, Mr. Henry was a member of the principal investing arm of Morgan Stanley, where he was involved in the execution of leveraged buyouts on the firm’s behalf. Mr. Henry’s board memberships presently include ArrowMark Financial Corp, a Nasdaq listed company, Colonnade Acquisition Corp. II, a NYSE listed company, as well as the boards of a number of private portfolio investments of Tiger Infrastructure Partners. He is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Henry earned his MBA from Harvard Business School and his BA in Economics from Yale University.

Tara S. Innes has served as a director since February 2020. Ms. Innes is a former Managing Director, Global Head of Public Fixed Income Research at AIG Investments, Inc., a position she held from 2009 until April 2016, where she led a team of analysts in New York, London, Tokyo and Tel Aviv responsible for analysis and investment recommendations across investment grade, high yield, sovereign, municipal, and emerging markets asset classes. From 2006 to 2009, Ms. Innes was Team Leader of Financial Institutions at AIG Asset Management US LLC. Before joining AIG in 2006, Ms. Innes served as managing director and team leader for REITs and Financial Institutions at Fitch Learning US Inc., a subsidiary of Fitch Ratings, Inc. Prior to joining Fitch in 2004, Ms. Innes served in various positions at MetLife, Inc. and Merrill Lynch Hubbard, Inc. focused on real estate investments and finance. Ms. Innes is a member of the Board of Directors, Treasurer and Chairman of the Finance Committee of The Credit Roundtable Association, an organization of institutional investors she co-founded in 2007 to educate investors and advocate for bondholders. Ms. Innes has been a frequent speaker at international investor and issuer conferences on a variety of fixed income investment topics and maintains longstanding relationships with the capital markets and syndication teams at many of the largest investment banks. Ms. Innes is National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Directorship Certified. She earned her BA from Boston College.

7

Biographical Information Regarding Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors

As of the date of this proxy statement, our executive officers who are not directors are as follows:

Meghan G. Baivier is our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. Ms. Baivier has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since joining our company in May 2015 and as our Chief Financial Officer since March 2016. Prior to joining our company, Ms. Baivier served as Vice President of Citigroup’s Real Estate and Lodging Investment Banking group, from August 2010 to April 2015, where she was involved in a wide range of financial advisory and capital markets transactions. From March 2005 to June 2007, Ms. Baivier was an Equity Research Associate with Chilton Investment Co. Ms. Baivier was also previously employed by Fidelity Management and Research as a High Yield Research Associate from September 2001 to February 2005. Since July 2017, Ms. Baivier has served as a director of Sun Communities, Inc., a NYSE listed REIT. Ms. Baivier earned her MBA from Columbia Business School where she was awarded the prestigious Feldberg Fellowship and her BA from Wellesley College.

Allison E. Marino is our Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to joining the Company in August 2021, Ms. Marino served as Vice President and Corporate Controller of Carr Properties, a private real estate investment trust focused on the ownership, acquisition and development of office properties, from February 2020 to August 2021. She first joined Carr Properties in 2015 as a Director of Accounting. Prior to that, Ms. Marino served in Marriott International, Inc.’s Financial Reporting and Analysis group from 2010 to 2015 in various capacities, including as a Senior Manager and Manager. She began her career at Ernst & Young, LLP in its real estate practice. Ms. Marino is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. She earned her BS in Business Administration from the University of Pittsburgh and her MBA from the University of North Carolina.

Franklin V. Logan is our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. From January 2018 until his appointment as Executive Vice President in February 2023, Mr. Logan served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Before joining our company in January 2018, Mr. Logan was an associate in the Real Estate Industry Group of Goodwin Procter LLP, where he represented various REITs in securities law, public and private mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance and general corporate matters. Before joining Goodwin Procter LLP in 2010, Mr. Logan served as a Government Affairs Representative at Stuntz, Davis and Staffier, PC, a Washington, D.C. law firm, where he represented the interests of clients before the U.S. Congress and various federal agencies on a wide range of issues from general appropriations and budgetary matters to issues of homeland security, telecommunications, immigration, criminal justice and healthcare. He began his career as staff member to a United States Senator. Mr. Logan earned his JD from Georgetown University Law Center and his BA from Rice University.

J. Stuart Burns is our Executive Vice President, Government Relations. Mr. Burns has over 35 years of government and private sector experience, with 19 years focused on federal government real estate management. Prior to joining our company in February 2023, Mr. Burns was the Assistant Commissioner for Facilities Management in the GSA’s Public Buildings Service (PBS) from July 2022 until February 2023 and Assistant Commissioner for Portfolio Management and Customer Engagement in GSA’s PBS from June 2015 to July 2022. In these roles, he was responsible for managing a portfolio of over 370 million square feet, including over 8,700 owned and leased assets and more than 560 historic properties. He also led PBS’s customer relationship management for more than 70 federal agencies. He partnered with agencies to set strategic objectives for their portfolios, provided guidance on leading edge real estate practices, and acted as the senior point of accountability for all issue resolution. From 2003 to 2015, Mr. Burns worked for the Internal Revenue Service in increasing levels of responsibility. In his final position there, he served as the Acting Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support, overseeing the integration of

8

real estate, technology, shared services, procurement, as well as all finance and human resource needs for the Internal Revenue Service. Mr. Burns serves on the Board of the Federal Real Property Association, a non-profit association of Federal property asset managers and real estate professionals. Mr. Burns is a graduate of the University of Virginia with a bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science.

Director Independence

Under the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE, at least a majority of our directors and all members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must be “independent” as defined by the NYSE. The NYSE standards provide that to qualify as an independent director, in addition to satisfying certain bright-line criteria, the Board must affirmatively determine that a director has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us).

The Board has determined that each of the following existing directors is an “independent director” as defined by the NYSE rules: William H. Binnie, Cynthia A. Fisher, Scott D. Freeman, Emil W. Henry, Jr. and Tara S. Innes. Our independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions without the presence of our executive officers and non-independent directors.

The Board and its Committees

The Board has established three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of these committees currently is composed exclusively of independent directors, in accordance with the NYSE listing standards. The principal functions of each committee are briefly described below. The current charters for each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on our website at www.easterlyreit.com under the “Investor Relations—Governance—Governance Guidelines” section. Additionally, the Board may from time to time establish certain other committees to facilitate the management of our company.

The Board held seven meetings in 2022. Our Audit Committee met four times in 2022. Our Compensation Committee met five times in 2022. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times in 2022. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board which were held during the period that such person served on the Board and (ii) the total number of meetings of committees of the Board held during the period that such person served on such committee.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee consists of four of our directors, each of whom is an independent director. Each of Ms. Innes and Messrs. Henry and Freeman qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined by the applicable SEC regulations and NYSE corporate governance listing standards. The Board has determined that each of the Audit Committee members is “financially literate” as that term is defined by the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

We have an Audit Committee charter that details the principal functions of the Audit Committee, including oversight related to:

9

The Audit Committee is also responsible for engaging an independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, including all audit and non-audit services, reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees, and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee also prepares the Audit Committee report required by SEC regulations to be included in this proxy statement. In addition, the Audit Committee oversees our risk management processes related to cybersecurity, including discussing no less than annually our cybersecurity plan with management or our internal auditor. Additional information regarding the functions performed by our Audit Committee is set forth in the Audit Committee report. Ms. Innes is the chair and Ms. Fisher, Mr. Freeman and Mr. Henry serve as members of the Audit Committee.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee consists of five of our directors, each of whom is an independent director. We have a Compensation Committee charter that details the principal functions of the Compensation Committee, including:

Mr. Binnie is the chair and Ms. Fisher, Mr. Freeman, Mr. Henry and Ms. Innes serve as members of the Compensation Committee.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of three of our directors, each of whom is an independent director. We have adopted a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter that details the principal functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, including:

10

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has oversight responsibilities over the Company’s environmental (including climate change), social and related governance, or ESG, initiatives, risks, strategies and policies. Ms. Fisher is the chair and Mr. Binnie and Mr. Henry serve as members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Board Qualifications

We value diversity of views, experience, skill sets, gender and ethnicity in identifying and selecting Board members. Our Board nominees reflect diverse perspectives, including a complementary mix of skills, experience, and backgrounds, that we believe are important to our ability to represent the interests of all our stakeholders.

Skills / Qualifications William H. Binnie Darrell C. Crate Cynthia A. Fisher Scott D. Freeman Emil W. Henry, Jr, Michael P. Ibe Tara S. Innes William C. Trimble, III Public Company Executive/ Director Investment / Financial Experience Portfolio/ Investment Management Experience Government Experience Direct Property Acquisition Experience Direct Property Asset Management Experience Credit Analysis Experience Direct Debt Investment Experience Entrepreneurial Background Private Equity Investment Experience REIT Management Experience

From the top down, including not only our Board but also our senior management team, we are committed to cultivating an inclusive company culture that attracts top talent and creates an environment that fosters collaboration, innovation, diversity and inclusion. As of December 31, 2022:

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter requires that any initial list of new director candidates considered by the committee must include qualified women and minority candidates. Although the Board does not currently have a racially or ethnically diverse member, these requirements formalize the Board’s commitment to seeking diverse candidates for open board positions and are particularly salient as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee continues to focus on identifying qualified women and racially diverse director candidates as part of its ongoing board refreshment process. The Board believes that board refreshment is

11

important for ensuring an appropriate mix of skills and diversity of backgrounds and providing fresh perspectives, while leveraging the institutional knowledge and insight of the Board’s longer-tenured members. Our active refreshment process led to the appointment in 2020 of two highly qualified independent directors to our Board, Tara S. Innes and Scott D. Freeman.

Director Compensation

In 2022, we paid to each of our non-employee directors an annual retainer equal to approximately $190,000, consisting of $75,000 payable in equal bi-annual cash installments and an equity award having a value of approximately $115,000 granted upon the election of the non-employee director following the 2022 annual meeting. The equity awards will vest upon the earlier of the anniversary of the date of grant or the Company’s 2023 annual meeting of stockholders and was made in the form of shares of restricted common stock, or, if elected by such non-employee director, long-term incentive units in our operating partnership, or LTIP units (or a combination of both). We also reimbursed each of our directors for travel expenses incurred in connection with his or her attendance at full Board and committee meetings. Under our director compensation program, directors do not receive meeting attendance fees for any meeting of our Board of Directors or a committee thereof that he or she attends.

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the compensation of our non-employee directors. In 2022, our Compensation Committee engaged Ferguson Partners Consulting, or FPC, to review our director compensation program and conduct a benchmark analysis of non-employee director compensation programs in place at comparable public companies. Based on its review, the Compensation Committee made no changes to our director compensation program in 2022.

Directors of our company who are also employees receive no additional compensation for their services as directors. The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid to our non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022:

12

PROPOSAL 2: NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Section 14A(a)(1) of the Exchange Act generally requires each public company to include in its proxy statement a separate resolution subject to a non-binding stockholder vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in its proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, not less frequently than once every three years. This is commonly known as, and is referred to herein as, a “say-on-pay” proposal or resolution.

At our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders voted on, among other matters, a proposal regarding the frequency of holding a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. More than 95% of the votes cast on the frequency proposal were cast in favor of holding a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers every year, which was consistent with the recommendation of the Board. The Board considered the voting results with respect to the frequency proposal and other factors, and the Board currently intends for the Company to hold a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers every year until the next required advisory vote on the frequency of holding the non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, which will occur not later than the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 14A(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Company is providing stockholders with the opportunity to approve the following non-binding advisory resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR this resolution.

We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our named executive officers’ compensation as described in this proxy statement. This vote is not limited to any specific item of compensation, but rather addresses the overall compensation of our named executive officers and our philosophy, policies and practices relating to their compensation as described in this proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K.

Vote Required; Effect of Vote

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal will be required for adoption of this resolution. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be treated as votes cast and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

The say-on-pay resolution is advisory, and therefore will not have any binding legal effect on the Company or the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee does value the opinions of our stockholders and intends to take the results of the vote on this proposal into account in its future decisions regarding the compensation of our named executive officers.

13

PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed the accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not required by law, the NYSE or the Company’s organizational documents. However, as a matter of good corporate governance, the Board has elected to submit the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the stockholders for ratification at the 2023 annual meeting. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. If stockholders do not ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee will take that fact into consideration, together with such other factors it deems relevant, in determining its next selection of an independent registered public accounting firm. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since our formation in 2014 and is considered by our management to be well-qualified. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has advised us that neither it nor any member thereof has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in the Company or any of our subsidiaries in any capacity.

A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is expected to be present at the annual meeting, will be given the opportunity to make a statement at the annual meeting if he or she so desires, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

Vote Required; Effect of Vote

A majority of all of the votes cast at the annual meeting at which a quorum is present is required for the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. Abstentions will have no effect on this proposal.

Fee Disclosure

Audit and Non-Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, for the indicated services for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were as follows:

14

Audit Committee Policy Regarding Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our Audit Committee has established a policy that generally requires that all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm will be pre-approved by the Audit Committee, or a designated Audit Committee member. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. All permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm have been pre-approved by the Audit Committee, or a designated Audit Committee member. Our Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the accountants’ independence and determined that it is consistent with such independence.

15

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that might incorporate this proxy statement or future filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, in whole or in part, the following report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any such filing.

The undersigned members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Easterly Government Properties, Inc. submit this report in connection with the committee’s review of the financial reports for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 as follows:

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 for filing with the SEC.

Submitted by our Audit Committee

Tara S. Innes (Chair)

Cynthia A. Fisher

Scott D Freeman

Emil W. Henry, Jr.

16

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

We are committed to operating our business responsibly and creating long-term value for our stockholders through implementation of our business strategy as well as strong corporate stewardship. The Company’s environmental, social and governance committee (the “ESG Committee”), a committee formed in 2018, is chaired by our Director of Sustainability and is comprised of executive officers and senior employees across the breadth of our operations. The ESG Committee is responsible for identifying, initiating and monitoring sustainable and responsible practices in all aspects of our business for the benefit of all our stakeholders, including our tenants, stockholders, employees and the communities in which we operate. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the Company’s environmental (including climate change), social and related governance, or ESG, efforts, and is charged with reviewing and discussing periodically, but no less than annually, with management the Company’s ESG strategy, initiatives and policies.

In 2022, we published our inaugural Environmental, Social, and Governance report (our “ESG Report”) which included the announcement of our alignment with five United Nations Sustainable Development Goals as well as environmental and social goals. These goals aim to help reduce our greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and address climate change performance. Additionally, we developed an Environmental Management System (our “EMS”) to guide ESG decision making and brought in an ESG software provider to assist in aggregating and analyzing environmental data such as energy and water usage and GHG emissions in our portfolio.

We continue to build on the corporate responsibility initiatives first adopted in 2020 as part of the Company’s Environmental Sustainability, Social Responsibility and Human Rights Policy (our “E&S Policy”). The environmental sustainability policies outlined in our E&S Policy are designed to address environmental risks and opportunities in our business, promote greater awareness and responsibility among our employees, and engagement with our U.S. Government tenant agencies. The social responsibility policies are designed to reinforce our core principles regarding equal opportunity, competitive compensation, ethical behavior, workplace safety, open and risk-free communication and legal compliance. We believe these commitments align seamlessly with our pledge to provide a work environment that attracts, develops, and retains top talent by affording our employees an engaging work experience that allows for career development and opportunities for meaningful civic involvement.

We are committed to strong corporate governance and transparency for our stockholders and review corporate best practices on an ongoing basis. Since 2019, we have adopted a majority voting standard in uncontested elections, a director resignation policy, stock ownership guidelines for our directors and senior management and a clawback policy. In 2021, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the approval of the Board, our stockholders overwhelmingly approved an amendment to our bylaws that allows stockholders the right to amend our bylaws.

Our inaugural ESG Report, our EMS and our E&S Policy are available on our website at www.easterlyreit.com under the “Corporate Responsibility” section. The information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.

The U.S. Government, as our primary tenant, serves as a natural partner for our sustainability and environmental stewardship endeavors. Under the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the U.S. Government maintains “green lease” policies that include the “Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy” as one of the factors it considers when leasing property. The U.S. Government’s “green lease” initiative permits U.S. Government tenants to require LEED-CI certification in selecting new premises or renewing leases at existing premises.

We actively seek opportunities to better assess our portfolio’s performance and explore methods to improve efficiency over time. In addition, we are committed to increasing the energy efficiency of our portfolio properties by

17

identifying, adopting and implementing strategic management approaches designed to mitigate the reliance on non-renewable energy sources and capitalize on the opportunities provided by clean or renewable energy sources. In furtherance of this commitment, we continually strive to work collaboratively with our tenants by implementing environmentally-driven energy efficiency programs.

18

We are committed to providing an inclusive and engaging work environment that generates long-term value for our employees and stockholders. We also strive to provide a diverse and safe workplace by promoting the health, wellness and development of our employees while upholding our corporate responsibility as a public company for the benefit of our stockholders and tenants. To further these objectives, we have established a number of policies and programs and undertaken various initiatives, including:

19

20

Additionally, Easterly is committed to supporting small businesses in the communities in which we operate. As such, over time Easterly is developing small business utilization goals to ensure that we continue to be positive contributors to the communities supporting the operations of our portfolio.

We are committed to operating our business under strong and accountable corporate governance practices and have structured our corporate governance in a manner we believe closely aligns our interests with those of our stockholders. Notable features of our corporate governance structure include the following:

21

22

ADDITIONAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

We are committed to operating our business under strong and accountable corporate governance practices. You are encouraged to visit the “Investor Relations—Governance—Governance Guidelines” section of our website at www.easterlyreit.com to view or to obtain copies of our committee charters, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Guidelines. The information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC. You also may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the respective charters of our committees, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Guidelines by directing your request in writing to Easterly Government Properties, Inc., 2001 K Street, NW, Suite 775 North, Washington, D.C. 20006, Attention: Investor Relations. Additional information relating to the corporate governance of the Company is also included in other sections of this proxy statement.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Guidelines that address significant issues of corporate governance and set forth procedures by which the Board carries out its responsibilities. Among the areas addressed by the Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Guidelines are director qualification standards, director responsibilities, Board structure, director access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, management succession, annual performance evaluation of the Board and committees, related person transaction approval and disclosure policy, and stockholder rights plan. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, assessing and periodically reviewing the adequacy of the Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Guidelines and recommending, as appropriate, proposed changes to the Board.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that each of our director nominees, except for Messrs. Crate, Trimble and Ibe, has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company) and is “independent” within the meaning of our director independence standards, which reflect the NYSE director independence standards, as currently in effect. Furthermore, the Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company) and is “independent” within the meaning of our director independence standards.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our officers, directors and employees. Among other matters, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

We intend to maintain the highest standards of ethical business practices and compliance with all laws and regulations applicable to our business. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on the “Investor Relations—Governance—Governance Guidelines” section of our website at www.easterlyreit.com. We intend to disclose on our website any amendment to, or waiver of, any provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

23

that apply to any of our directors and executive officers that would otherwise be required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC or the NYSE.

Communications with the Board

We have a process by which stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the non-employee directors, both individually and as a group, through the Board’s Lead Independent Director. In cases where stockholders or other interested parties wish to communicate directly with non-employee directors, messages can be sent in writing or by email to: William H. Binnie, Lead Independent Director, Easterly Government Properties, Inc., c/o Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, 2001 K Street, NW, Suite 775 North, Washington, D.C. 20006, Email: leadindependentdirector@easterlyreit.com. Under the Company’s stockholder communications policy, the Company’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer acts as agent for the Lead Independent Director in facilitating direct communications to the non-employee directors, forwarding such communications to the Lead Independent Director. Any such communications may be made anonymously.

Audit Committee Complaint Procedures

Our Audit Committee has established procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal controls or auditing matters, and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

We have a policy pursuant to which all directors are expected to attend our annual meetings of stockholders in person, unless doing so is impracticable because of unavoidable conflicts. Where a director is unable to attend an annual meeting in person, but is able to do so by telephonic conferencing, the Company will arrange for the director’s participation by means where the director can hear, and be heard, by those present at the meeting. All directors attended our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders either in person or by telephonic conferencing.

Director Tenure and Board Refreshment

Led by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board is focused on creating and maintaining board composition that has the objectivity, diversity and mix of skills, reputation and experience to provide comprehensive and effective oversight of the Company’s strategic and operational goals, as well as the knowledge, ability and independence to deliver the high standard of governance expected by our stockholders.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board are mindful that director tenure can be relevant to the Board’s performance and believe that ongoing board refreshment is an important component for ensuring an appropriate mix of skills and providing fresh perspectives, while leveraging the institutional knowledge and insight of the Board’s longer-tenured members. The Board includes several longer-serving directors with significant expertise and institutional knowledge who bring critical skills to the boardroom. Such longer-serving directors have a deep understanding of the Company’s business and strategy, provide historical context in Board deliberations, and enhance Board dynamics and the Board’s relationship with management. The average tenure of our directors, including management directors, is currently approximately seven years.

Identification of Director Candidates

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in identifying and reviewing director candidates to determine whether they qualify for membership on the Board and recommends director nominees to the Board to be considered for election at our annual meeting of stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a written policy on the criteria and process of identifying and reviewing director candidates. In December 2020, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee amended its policy regarding director nominees to require that any initial list of new director candidates must include qualified women and minority candidates.

24

At a minimum, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must be satisfied that each director candidate (i) has experience at a strategic or policymaking level in a business, legal, accounting, government, non-profit or academic organization of high standing, (ii) is highly accomplished in their respective field, (iii) is well regarded in the community and must have a reputation for the highest ethical and moral standards and (iv) has sufficient time and availability to devote to the affairs of the Company, particularly in light of the number of boards on which the nominee may serve.

In addition to the minimum qualifications for each nominee set forth above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must recommend that the Board select persons for nomination to help ensure that (i) a majority of the Board will be “independent” in accordance with the standards established pursuant to Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, (ii) each of its Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees will be comprised entirely of independent directors, and (iii) at least one member of the Audit Committee will have accounting or related financial management expertise.

Finally, in addition to any other standards the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may deem appropriate from time to time for the overall structure and composition of the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may, but is not required to, consider (i) whether the nominee has direct experience in the real estate industry, particularly in the office real estate or government-leasing industry, and (ii) whether the nominee, if elected, assists in achieving a mix of Board members that represents a diversity of background and experience. For more information of the skills and qualifications of the current members of the Board, see “Proposal 1: Election of Directors—Board Qualifications.”

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider director candidates recommended by our stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will apply the same standards in considering candidates submitted by stockholders as it does in evaluating candidates submitted by members of the Board. Any recommendations by stockholders are to follow the procedures outlined under “Stockholder Proposals” in this proxy statement and should provide the reasons supporting a candidate’s recommendation, the candidate’s qualifications and the candidate’s written consent to being considered as a director nominee. In addition, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act. No proxies are being solicited for director candidates other than the Company’s nominees and no director candidates were recommended by our stockholders for election at the 2023 annual meeting.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board currently is comprised of five independent and three non-independent directors. Darrell W. Crate serves as Chairman of the Board and Michael P. Ibe serves as Vice Chairman of the Board. The Board has appointed William H. Binnie, one of the independent directors, to serve as Lead Independent Director. We believe that the number of independent, experienced directors that make up the Board, along with the independent oversight of our Lead Independent Director, benefits the Company and its stockholders.

We recognize that different board leadership structures may be appropriate for companies in different situations, and that no one structure is suitable for all companies. Our current Board leadership structure is optimal for us because it demonstrates to our employees and other stakeholders that the Company is under strong leadership.

The Lead Independent Director has the following responsibilities:

25

Our Lead Independent Director also has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors.

We believe that the Lead Independent Director is an integral part of the Board’s structure that promotes strong, independent oversight of our management and affairs.

Risk Oversight

The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management process. The Board focuses on the Company’s general risk management strategy and the most significant risks facing the Company, and ensures that appropriate risk mitigation strategies are implemented by management. The Board also is apprised of particular risk management matters in connection with its general oversight and approval of corporate matters.

The Board has delegated to the Audit Committee oversight of the Company’s risk management process. Among its duties, the Audit Committee reviews with management (i) the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and management of risks that may be material to the Company, (ii) the Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting, and (iii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, the Audit Committee has oversight responsibility of the Company’s risk management processes related to cyber security, including discussing no less than annually the Company’s cybersecurity plan with management or the Company’s internal auditor. Our other committees of the Board also consider and address risk as they perform their respective committee responsibilities. All committees report to the full Board as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of a material or enterprise level risk.

The Board has delegated to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversight responsibilities over the Company’s environmental (including climate change), social and related governance, or ESG, initiatives, risks, strategies and policies. In addition, the Compensation Committee considers the risks to the Company’s stockholders and to achievement of our goals that may be inherent in the Company’s compensation program.

The Company’s management is responsible for day-to-day risk management, including the primary monitoring and testing function for company-wide policies and procedures, and management of the day-to-day oversight of the risk management strategy for the ongoing business of the Company. This oversight includes identifying, evaluating, and addressing potential risks that may exist at the enterprise, strategic, financial, operational, and compliance and reporting levels.

The Board and its committees receive regular reports from management on potential risks to the Company in the context of, among other things, market conditions, leasing activity and expected expirations, management of debt maturities and interest-rate risk, access to capital markets, ESG risks, cyber threats and succession planning.

We believe the division of risk management responsibilities described above is an effective approach for addressing the risks facing the Company and that the Board leadership structure supports this approach.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

Our Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Guidelines require the independent directors to meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management participation and at least once each year. The Lead Independent Director presides at those meetings. In accordance with such requirement, our independent directors meet in executive sessions after each regularly scheduled meeting of the entire Board and at such other times that the independent directors deem appropriate.

Stockholder Engagement and Outreach

Our commitment to understanding the interests and perspectives of our stockholders is a key component of our corporate governance strategy as well as our compensation philosophy. We meet regularly with analysts and institutional investors to inform and share our perspective and to solicit their feedback on our performance. In

26

addition, our senior management team regularly participates throughout the year in investor conferences as well as one on one meetings with our investors. In connection with our annual stockholder meeting, we also proactively engage in dialogue with our stockholders to solicit their feedback on our executive compensation programs and our corporate governance policies and programs. We plan to continue to expand our engagement with our investors in 2023, as we believe the perspectives provided by our stockholders provide valuable information to be considered in our decision making process.

Annual Elections; Majority Voting

Our bylaws provide for majority voting in uncontested director elections, pursuant to which a director is elected in an uncontested election if he or she receives more votes for his or her election than votes against his or her election. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any incumbent director who fails to be elected by a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election must promptly submit a written offer to resign to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will then act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and, if applicable, the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date of the certification of election results. If the resignation is not accepted, the director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting and until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualified. The director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in the Board’s decision regarding his or her resignation, but will participate in other Board matters until the Board’s decision is made with respect to his or her resignation. Our bylaws retain plurality voting for contested director elections.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

Under our policies, no employee, including executives, or director may buy or sell puts, calls, other derivative securities of the Company or any derivative securities that provide the economic equivalent of ownership of any of the Company’s securities or an opportunity, direct or indirect, to profit from any change in the value of the Company’s securities or engage in any other hedging transaction with respect to the Company’s securities, at any time, unless such transaction has been approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not approved nor entertained any requests for waivers from our anti-hedging policy.

We also have an anti-pledging policy whereby no employee, including executives, or director may pledge Company securities or securities convertible into Company securities as collateral for a loan (or modify an existing pledge) unless the pledge has been approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Prior to our initial public offering, our Chairman and Vice Chairman were granted limited contractual rights to pledge the common units they received in exchange for the properties and entities contributed at the time of our initial public offering. The grant of these rights was an integral part of the agreements entered into as part of our formation and our initial public offering and necessary to secure the properties comprising our initial portfolio. These rights are contractually fixed and pre-date the appointment of any of the members of our existing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the implementation of our corporate governance policies. In October 2022, our Vice Chairman requested and was granted a limited waiver to modify the terms of his existing pledge agreement entered into in connection with our formation transactions and our initial public offering. Under the waiver, our Vice Chairman is permitted to increase the number of common units pledged, but only to the extent such common units had previously been pledged in connection with our formation transactions and initial public offering and then subsequently released from such pledge. For more information, see “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”

Minimum Equity Ownership Guidelines

We believe that stock ownership by our executive officers and outside directors helps to align their interests with the interests of our stockholders. The Board has adopted minimum equity ownership guidelines that require each of the Company’s named executive officers and non-employee directors to maintain a minimum equity investment in the Company, expressed as a multiple of base salary or annual cash retainer. Under these guidelines, covered individuals must maintain an equity investment in the Company having a value equal to or greater than (i) in the case of our

27

Chief Executive Officer, a multiple of six times base salary, (ii) in the case of our other named executive officers, a multiple of two times base salary, and (iii) in the case of non-employee directors, a multiple of five times annual cash retainer.

Each individual covered by the policy must achieve the minimum equity investment within five years from the later of the date of the adoption of the policy and the date of such individual’s appointment, and if such minimum is not attained within the specified period, he or she must retain 50% of the value of any equity held and subsequently awarded, net of taxes, until such minimum is met.

28

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Throughout this proxy statement, the following individuals who served as our chief executive officer and chief financial officer during 2022 and the other three most highly-compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2022, as determined in accordance with applicable SEC rules, are collectively referred to as our named executive officers.

The Compensation Committee has designed our executive compensation program to achieve the following:

The compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee have reflected our overall achievements with respect to (i) the contributions of our named executive officers to our financial and operating performance, and (ii) pre-established performance goals under our incentive cash bonus program and our long-term equity incentive plan.

2022 Say-on-Pay Vote

At the Company’s 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers for 2021. The result of this vote showed overwhelming support for our executive compensation program and policies. The Compensation Committee viewed the vote as validation of the pay-for-performance principles that underpinned its 2021 compensation decisions, and which continued to be the guiding principles of our 2022 executive compensation program.

Easterly Say-on-Pay Support

29

Easterly Say-on-Pay Support average 2018-2022 92.6% 2022 96.8%

Average 2018-2022 92.6% 2022 96.8%

Average 2018-2022 92.6% 2022 96.8%

2022 Business Highlights

Since our initial public offering in February 2015, our focus has been to deliver strong strategic, financial and operating results with the goal of generating attractive risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders over the long-term through the acquisition, development and management of Class A commercial properties with leases backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. In 2022, our executive team continued to deliver on the disciplined execution of our business strategy, despite continued disruptions in the United States, regional and global economies and significant volatility in financial markets. Our company’s fiscal year 2022 accomplishments, guided by our named executive officers, illustrate this focus.

10.6 YRS Weighted average remaining lease term on U.S. Government leases $205.3M Gross Proceeds received from the strategic disposition of 10 assets $0.265 Maintained quarterly cash dividend, averaging a 5.8% dividend yield in 2022 45% Percentage of portfolio assets with at least one green certification $1.27 FFO per share on a fully diluted basis far 2022 1 97.1% Annualized lease income derived from the U.S. Government 99% Percentage leases across the Easterly portfolio 2 $1.47B Marked Cap (Fully-Diluted) 35 Different tenant agencies from the U.S. Government in the Easterly portfolio 162,000 Approximate number of square feet under development $92.5M Expected net proceeds from the sale of unsettled forward shares 3 93.5% Percentage of fixed rate debt exposure $2.72B Total Enterprise Value $252.2 M Approximate total acquisition volume in 2022, including pro rata through our joint venture 19.3 YRS Weighted average lease term for leases renewed in 2022

49% Percentage of portfolio assets with at least one green certification 162,000 Approximate number of square feet under development 10.6 YRS Weighted average remaining lease term on U.S Government leases renewed in 2022 99% Percentage leased across the Easterly portfolio2 $2.72 B Total Enterprise Value $1.27 FFO per share on a fully diluted basis for 20221 $92.5M Expected net proceeds from the sale of unsettled forward shares3 $205.3M Gross proceeds received from the strategic disposition of 10 assets $1.47B Market Cap (Fully-Diluted) $252.2M Approximate total acquisition volume in 2022, including pro rata through our joint venture 97.1% Annualized lease income derived from the U.S. Government 93.5% Percentage of fixed rate debt exposure $0.265 Maintained quarterly cash dividend, averaging a 5.7% dividend yield in 2022 35 Different tenant agencies from the U.S. Government in the Easterly portfolio 19.3YRS Weighted average lease term for leases renewed in 2022

Note: Unless otherwise noted, data presented is as of December 31, 2022.

The wholly-owned acquisitions include:

30

The JV acquisitions include:

31

32

Overview of Compensation Philosophy & Objectives

We seek to maintain a total compensation package that provides fair, reasonable and competitive compensation for our executive officers while also permitting us the flexibility to differentiate actual pay based on the level of individual and organizational performance. Our executive compensation programs are designed to:

33

We believe our executive compensation programs are effectively designed and work in alignment with the interests of our stockholders with a number of key features including:

Roles of the Compensation Committee, Compensation Consultant and Management

Compensation Committee

Our executive compensation programs are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board. The members of the Compensation Committee are William H. Binnie (Chair), Cynthia A. Fisher, Scott D. Freeman, Emil W. Henry, Jr. and Tara S. Innes, each of whom is “independent” under the independence standards of the NYSE. The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for monitoring the performance of our executives and evaluating and approving our executive compensation plans, policies and programs. In addition, the Compensation Committee oversees and administers our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan.

Compensation Consultant

For 2022, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of Ferguson Partners Consulting, or FPC, as its independent outside compensation consultant. All executive compensation services provided by FPC were conducted under the direction or authority of the Compensation Committee, and all work performed by FPC was pre-approved by the Compensation Committee. Neither FPC nor any of its affiliates maintains any other material business relationships with the Company or our executive officers. As requested by the Compensation Committee, in 2022, FPC’s services to the Compensation Committee included preparing analyses of executive compensation levels as compared to a peer group and recommending changes to our executive compensation programs.

34

Management

Our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer attend Compensation Committee meetings, provide information as to the individual performance of the other executive officers and make annual recommendations to the Compensation Committee of appropriate compensation levels for all executive officers other than themselves. Nonetheless, all components of our named executive officers’ compensation must be approved by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion.

Peer Group

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews external market data to determine the competitiveness of our executive compensation structure. Because of our unique position as the only internally managed public company REIT focused primarily on the acquisition, development and management of commercial properties leased to the U.S. Government, there are no directly comparable peers against which we can assess pay and performance. For external comparisons and in light of best practices, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with FPC, determined that our peer group should generally contain companies that are similar in size to us, defined as companies that are no less than one-half (0.5x) our size and no larger than twice (2.0x) our size, as defined by total capitalization, a commonly used metric for determining size in the REIT industry. Of the companies previously included in the peer group for 2021, Agree Realty Corporation was removed as it no longer fit within the size threshold. Corporate Office Properties Trust and Kite Realty Group Trust were added to the 2022 peer group as their total capitalization conformed to the size threshold. However, subsequent to the Compensation Committee’s peer group determination for 2022, Kite Realty Group Trust merged with Retail Properties of America, Inc. Prior to the merger, the total capitalization of Kite Realty Group Trust was approximately 1.1x the total capitalization of our company. Our peers used to assist the Compensation Committee in making 2022 executive compensation decisions consisted of the following public company REITs, plus Columbia Property Trust, Inc., which was acquired in December 2021 and ceased to be a public company after our 2022 peer group was established:

35

FPC provides market data and practices of our peer group for the Compensation Committee to consider, as well as executive compensation trends and developments. Specifically, FPC provides information regarding the design and levels of compensation paid by our peers and overall advice to determine the appropriate structure of our executive compensation programs.

For purposes of determining the overall level of our named executive officers’ compensation (i.e., base salary, annual incentive cash bonus and long-term equity incentive compensation), the Compensation Committee reviews both the total compensation and the mix of compensation components paid by our peer group to executives in comparable positions. Each named executive officer’s target compensation, however, is not mechanically established as a particular percentage of the peer group. The Compensation Committee also takes into account the named executive officer’s role and experience, as compared to our peers’ executives, and other factors, such as experience, retention and responsibility. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that ultimately the decision as to appropriate target compensation for a particular executive should be made based on the full review of individual and Company performance, as well as market data.

Overall, FPC determined that our executive compensation programs, as structured, are competitive relative to our peers. Based upon the review of peer group compensation levels, and general industry compensation levels, the Compensation Committee believes that the value and design of our executive compensation programs are appropriate for a company of our size, structure and business.

Elements of the Compensation Program

We have designed our executive compensation programs to include three principal elements – (i) base salary, (ii) annual incentive cash bonus, and (iii) performance- and service-based long-term equity incentives, in the form of long-term incentive units in our operating partnership, or LTIP units, each of which is integrated into the Company’s executive compensation program and intended to achieve different objectives. We believe that an emphasis on annual incentive cash bonus and long-term equity incentive compensation creates greater alignment with the interests of our stockholders, ensures that our business strategy is executed by decision-makers in a manner that focuses on the creation of both long-term value and short-term results, and encourages prudent evaluation of risks.

The following graphics illustrate the mix among base salary, incentive cash bonus and long-term equity compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and each of our other named executive officers as a percentage of his or her total compensation for 2022.

49.9% Equity Awards CEO 18.2% Base Salary 31.9% Target Cash Bonus 85% Performance-Based and/or at Risk 43.4% Equity Awards Other NEOs 23.8% Base Salary 32.8% Target Cash Bonus 80.4% Performance-Based and/or at Risk

20.4% Base Salary 56.1% Target Equity Award 23.5% Target Bonus CEO 79.6% Performance Based and/ or at Risk 49.0% Target Equity Award 26.9% Base Salary 24.1% Target Bonus 73.1% Performance Based and/or at Risk

Amounts shown consist of (i) 2022 base salary, (ii) 2022 target incentive cash bonus, and (iii) the grant date fair value of long-term incentive LTIP unit grants awarded in 2022.

As illustrated above, approximately 80% of our Chief Executive Officer’s annual pay opportunity and nearly 74% of our other named executive officers’ pay opportunities are performance-based and/or at risk, with approximately half in the form of long-term equity awards that are aligned with stockholder interests.

36

Base Salary

The base salary payable to each named executive officer provides a fixed component of compensation that reflects the executive’s position and responsibilities. The goal of our base salary program is to provide salaries at a level that allows us to attract and retain highly qualified executives while preserving significant flexibility to recognize and reward individual performance within the overall executive compensation program. Base salaries are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and may be adjusted to better match competitive market levels or to recognize an executive’s professional growth, development and increased responsibility.

In connection with its annual review of base salaries, the Compensation Committee approved the following 2022 base salaries for each of our named executive officers, taking into account each named executive officer’s individual performance, scope of responsibilities and prospects, and market data provided by FPC. In order to continue the focus on pay-for-performance we have established over the last several years, the Committee made no changes to the base salaries of Messrs. Trimble, Crate and Ibe and Ms. Baivier from their respective base salaries in 2021 and 2020. Ms. Marino received a $35,000 increase in her base salary from 2021, to better reflect market terms as she successfully completed her first full year as our chief accounting officer. Base salaries to our chief executive officer and our other named executive officers continued to remain well below the median base salary levels at our peer group of companies.

Annual Incentive Cash Bonus

Annual incentive cash bonuses are designed to reward our named executive officers for strong financial, operational and individual performance. We expect that eligibility to receive these cash bonuses will incentivize our named executive officers to strive to attain Company and individual performance goals that further our interests and the interests of our stockholders.

Under the 2022 annual incentive cash bonus program, the Compensation Committee set target bonuses for each of Messrs. Trimble, Crate and Ibe and Ms. Baivier in October 2021, with such officers eligible to earn up to a maximum of 200% of target based on the Company’s achievement of objective performance criteria and up to a maximum of 200% of target based on the named executive officer’s attainment of the applicable subjective performance criteria. For 2022, the Compensation Committee made no changes to the target bonus amounts established by the Compensation Committee for each of our named executive officers for 2021.

37

The final threshold, target and maximum bonus amounts allocated to each of our named executive officers for 2022 were as follows:

2022 Objective Criteria. Fifty percent of each named executive officer’s annual incentive cash bonus was determined in a formulaic manner based on the Company’s attainment of performance and strategic objectives tied to the Company’s 2022 FFO per share on a fully diluted basis and acquisition volume during 2022. The objective component of the 2022 incentive cash bonus program was based on the attainment of rigorous “threshold,” “target” and “maximum” performance levels corresponding to the payout levels for each objective component of each such named executive officer’s target cash incentive bonus payout, with performance:

The Compensation Committee decided that it was appropriate to use 2022 FFO per share on a fully diluted basis as a performance measure, since FFO is widely viewed as a key metric that REIT investors closely monitor. In addition, the Company considers FFO per share on a fully diluted basis to be a meaningful Company performance measure because it excludes various items in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of the operating performance of the ownership and management of the Company’s assets. FFO is defined by Nareit as as net income (loss), calculated in accordance with GAAP, excluding depreciation and amortization related to real estate, gains and losses from the sale of certain real estate assets, gains and losses from change in control and impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity. The Compensation Committee determined that 2022 acquisition volume was an appropriate performance measure to use, as external growth within our target market is a key component of our business strategy.

Overall, the Compensation Committee substantially increased the rigor of the 2022 objective performance hurdles from those established in 2021, including (i) year-over-year increases to the threshold, target and maximum FFO per share performance hurdles, as a result of which the 2021 maximum performance FFO hurdle of $1.32 per share was below the 2022 threshold FFO performance hurdle of $1.34 per share, and (ii) annual increases since 2019 in the acquisition volume performance hurdles resulting in the threshold increasing from $100 million in 2019 to $200 million in 2022, below which the payout would be zero.

38

Increased Rigor of FFO Per Share Hurdles

2020 FFO Hurdles Maximum: $1.26 Target: $1.22 Threshold: $1.20 2021 FFO Hurdles Maximum: $1.32 Target: $1.27 Threshold: $1.26 2022 FFO Hurdles Maximum: $1.36 Target: $1.35 Threshold: $1.34

Increased Rigor of Annual Acquisition Volume Hurdles

100% INCREASE in Acquisition Volume Threshold Goal 2019 to 2022 Year Threshold Acquisition Volume 2022 2021 2020 2019 $200 million $175 million $150 million $100 million

2022 FFO Hurdles Maximum: $1.36 Target $1.35 Threshold: $1.34 2021 FFO Hurdles Maximum: $1.32 Target: $1.27 Threshold: $1.26 2020 FFO Hurdles Maximum: $1.26 Target: $1.22 Threshold: $1.20 100% INCREASE in Acquisition Volume Threshold Goal 2019 to 2022 Year Threshold Acquisition Volume 2022 2021 2020 2019 $200 million $175 million $150 million $100 million

The following table sets forth for each of the 2022 objective performance criteria, the final threshold, target and maximum levels established by the Compensation Committee, our actual 2022 results and the payout as a percentage of the objective component achieved.

2022 Individual Subjective Criteria. Individual goals for each named executive officer accounted for up to 50% of such officer’s annual incentive cash bonus for 2022 and included a subjective evaluation of the leadership and managerial performance of each of our named executive officers. In determining each of our named executive officer’s achievement of his or her individual goals, the Compensation Committee assessed the performance of each named executive officer as compared to his or her individual performance criteria, as set forth below, and made a determination regarding the level of performance achieved.

39

40

The Compensation Committee evaluated each individual’s contributions to the Company’s performance against a backdrop of unprecedented economic turbulence headlined by rapidly rising interest rates, geopolitical unrest and disruptions in the capital markets. For many companies, as the year unfolded, goals and objectives that seemed obtainable at the outset of the period became neither feasible nor desirable due to evolving market conditions. However, for the Company, due to the unique nature of our primary tenant and our consistent, long-term outlook, the subjective goals and objectives established early in the year only became more challenging for our management team to achieve rather than impossible.

Despite the challenges facing the U.S. economy generally and the real estate sector in particular, the Company continued to execute its strategy throughout the year. We achieved or advanced each of our strategic goals during 2022, which we believe will position the Company for future success, thanks to the individual contributions of each of our named executive officers. As a result, in light of the challenging operating environment facing the Company and the steady advancement of our long-term vision, the Compensation Committee determined that each named executive officer earned 200% of their target bonus.

In particular, the Compensation Committee recognized the following contributions, among others, to the Company’s performance in 2022 by our named executive officers: (i) for Mr. Trimble, leading the senior management team to successfully execute on the Company’s business strategy, expanding on the Company’s outreach efforts with investors and other stakeholders, and effectively communicating the Company’s strategic direction and ESG initiatives (ii) for Ms. Baivier, successfully leading the Company’s strategic and growth platform during 2022, including seamlessly integrating the Company’s first joint venture into the business, opportunistically accessing the capital markets through the Company’s ATM programs, and leading the Company’s environmental sustainability efforts (iii) for Mr. Ibe, his leadership in sourcing numerous investment opportunities and his critical oversight of the Company’s development and redevelopment projects (iv) for Mr. Crate, his leadership in setting the strategic tone of the Company and guiding the Company with respect to the Company’s overall vision and ESG goals and (v) for Ms. Marino, her successful transition to the role of our chief accounting officer, including providing effective oversight of the accounting, financial reporting, risk management, tax, and internal audit functions and successfully leading the Company’s efforts in developing the ERP to support the Company’s strategic objectives, including its ESG initiatives.

Based on the Company’s performance with respect to the objective components of the annual incentive cash bonus program and factoring in the performance of each named executive officer under the pre-established subjective criteria, the Compensation Committee awarded 2022 annual incentive cash bonuses in the amounts set forth in the table below.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that a substantial portion of each named executive officer’s annual compensation should be in the form of long-term equity incentive compensation. Equity incentive awards encourage management to create stockholder value over the long-term, because the value of the equity awards is directly attributable to changes in the price of our common stock over time. In addition, equity awards are an effective tool for management retention because full vesting of the awards generally requires continued employment for multiple years.

41

Historically, we have granted most of the long-term equity incentive awards to our named executive officers in the form of LTIP units. LTIP units are designed to qualify as “profits interests” in our operating partnership for federal income tax purposes, meaning that initially they are not economically equivalent in value to a share of our common stock, but over time can increase in value to one-for-one parity with common stock by operation of special tax rules applicable to profits interests. LTIP units are designed to offer executives a long-term incentive comparable to restricted stock, while allowing them to enjoy a more favorable income tax treatment. Each LTIP unit awarded is deemed equivalent to an award of one share of common stock reserved under our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. The key difference between LTIP units and restricted stock is that at the time of award, LTIP units do not have full economic parity with common units, but, as stated above, can achieve such parity over time upon the occurrence of specified events in accordance with partnership tax rules. Prior to the performance measurement date, performance-based LTIP units are only entitled to one-tenth (10%) of the regular quarterly distributions payable on common units. The remaining nine-tenths (90%) of the distributions are treated as “re-invested” and are only earned at the end of the applicable performance period to the extent the underlying LTIP units are also earned. Until and unless parity is reached, the value that an executive will realize for a given number of vested LTIP units is less than the value of an equal number of shares of our common stock.

2022 LTIP Unit Awards. The long-term incentive program is designed to (i) further align the interests of our named executive officers with our stockholders over the longer term, (ii) support the objective of long-term consistent growth and reward our named executive officers based on our performance with respect to our total shareholder return, or TSR, and key Company operational metrics, and (iii) serve as a retention tool for our executives. The 2022 long-term incentive plan consists of a mix of (i) performance-based LTIP unit awards (60%) and (ii) service-based LTIP unit awards (40%). The performance-based LTIP unit awards may be earned based on the Company’s TSR performance, or TSR Performance LTIP Units, or based on the Company’s performance with respect to certain Company operational metrics, or Operational Performance LTIP Units.

TSR Performance LTIP Units. In order to reinforce our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, the TSR Performance LTIP Units can only be earned if we achieve rigorous performance goals over a three-year period based on (i) TSR performance on an annualized absolute basis, or Absolute TSR, (ii) TSR performance on an annualized basis relative to the FTSE Nareit Equity REITs Index, or Index Relative TSR, and (iii) TSR performance on an annualized basis adjusted for the change in price of a zero-coupon 10-year Treasury note, or US Treasury Relative TSR. The TSR Performance LTIP Unit awards are based 37.5% on Absolute TSR, 12.5% on Index Relative TSR and 50% on US Treasury Relative TSR.

42

The number of earned TSR Performance LTIP Units will be determined by the Compensation Committee following the end of the applicable performance period in accordance with the following payout matrices:

LTIP Units Subject to Absolute TSR Performance (1) (37.5% of Total TSR Performance LTIP Unit Grant) LTIP Units Subject to Index Relative TSR Performance (1) (12.5% of Total TSR Performance LTIP Unit Grant) LTIP Units Subject to US Treasury Relative TSR Performance (1) (50.0% of Total TSR Performance LTIP Unit Grant) Absolute TSR Percentage of Absolute LTIP Units Earned less than 4% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% or greater 0% 50% 75% 100% 150% 200% Relative TSR Percentage of Relative Ltip Units Earned equal or less than 75% of index 87.5% of index 100% of index 103.3% of index 106.7% of index 110% of index or greater 0% 50% 100% 150% 175% 200% US Treasury Relative TSR less than 3% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% or greater Percentage of US Treasury relative LTIP Units earned 0% 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200%

Absolute TSR Percentage of Absolute LTIP Units Earned less than 4% 0% 4% 50% 5% 75% 6% 100% 7% 150% 8% or greater 200% Relative TSR Percentage of Relative LTIP Units Earned Equal or less than 75% of Index 87.5% of Index 100% of Index 103.3% of Index 106.7% of Index 110% of Index of greater 0% 50% 100% 150% 175% 200% US Treasury Relative TSR less than 3% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% or greater 0% 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200%

Earned awards (if any) will vest following the end of the performance period, subject to the grantee’s continued employment as set forth in the applicable award agreement. Vesting will be accelerated in the event of termination of employment by the Company without cause, or termination of employment by the award recipient for good reason, death, disability or retirement.

Operational Performance LTIP Units. In order to motivate our named executive officers with respect to certain critical operating performance objectives and in support of our strategic focus on long-term stable and consistent growth, the Compensation Committee awarded 50% of the performance-based LTIP unit grants in the form of Operational Performance LTIP Units. The Operational Performance LTIP Units are subject to the attainment of operational criteria based 50% on the Company’s average annual acquisition volume over a three-year period and 50% based on the Company’s average quarterly occupancy percentage over a three-year period. With respect to each of the operational criteria, grants may only be earned if the Company performs at or above the applicable target. Average annual acquisition volume must be at least $200 million and the average quarterly occupancy percentage must be at least 95%. If target is not met at the end of the performance period, the LTIP units tied to the applicable performance measure are forfeited in their entirety. If performance for the relevant performance measure exceeds target at the end of the three-year performance period, no additional LTIP units will be awarded.

Earned awards (if any) will vest following the end of the performance period, subject to the grantee’s continued employment as set forth in the applicable award agreement. Vesting will be accelerated in the event of termination

43

of employment by the Company without cause, or termination of employment by the award recipient for good reason, death, disability or retirement.

Service-Based LTIP Unit Awards. In order to encourage the long-term retention of our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee granted 40% of the 2022 long-term incentive awards in the form of service-based LTIP unit awards. The Compensation Committee believes that service-based LTIP unit awards that vest over time independent of our TSR or operational performance promotes the retention of the Company’s talented management team, while still incentivizing a focus on long-term results because the ultimate value of the underlying stock awards is tied to our stock price.

The service-based LTIP units granted for 2022 will vest on December 31, 2024. Vesting will be accelerated in the event of termination of employment by the Company without cause, or termination of employment by the award recipient for good reason, death, disability or retirement.

The table below sets forth the total number of TSR Performance LTIP Units (at target), Operational Performance LTIP Units and Service-Based LTIP Units awarded to our named executive officers in 2022.

In 2019, the Board adopted a formal clawback policy, which allows the Compensation Committee to recoup compensation paid to a covered officer if the related financial results are subsequently restated as described below. The policy covers all of the Company’s current and former named executive officers. Pursuant to this policy, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement, then the Compensation Committee may require an employee covered by the policy to repay or forfeit to the Company “excess compensation.” Excess compensation includes annual incentive cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation in any form (including restricted stock and LTIP units, whether service-based or performance-based) received by that employee during the three-year period preceding the publication of the restated financial statements that the Compensation Committee determines was in excess of the amount that such employee would have received if such compensation had been determined based on the financial results reported in the restated financial statements. In making its determination to recoup compensation from an officer, the Compensation Committee may take into account any factors it deems reasonable, including any determination whether the officer engaged in fraud, willful misconduct or committed acts or omissions which materially contributed to the events that led to the restatement. We will revise our clawback policy to comply with Rule 10D-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 adopted by the SEC in October 2022 once final listing standards are adopted by the NYSE.

Other Elements of Compensation

Employee Benefits and Perquisites. Our full-time employees are eligible to participate in health and welfare benefit plans, such as medical, dental, life and long-term disability insurance. Pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements, Mr. Trimble and Ms. Baivier are also entitled to certain perquisites. See “—Severance and Change in Control Benefits” below.

44

401(k) Plan. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, allows eligible employees to defer a portion of their compensation, within prescribed limits, on a pre-tax basis through contributions to a 401(k) plan. We established a 401(k) retirement savings plan for our employees, including our named executive officers, who satisfy certain eligibility requirements. Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan on the same terms as other full-time employees.

Matching Charitable Contributions. We have established a charitable donation-matching program pursuant to which the Company will match up to $500 per year of each employee’s donation to a qualifying charitable organization.

Accounting Standards

The Compensation Committee will regularly consider the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to our equity plans and programs. As accounting standards change, we may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives. ASC Topic 718 requires us to recognize an expense for the fair value of equity-based compensation awards. Grants of equity awards under our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan will be accounted for under ASC Topic 718.

Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Programs

The Compensation Committee has discussed the concept of risk as it relates to our compensation programs with management and FPC, and our Compensation Committee does not believe the goals, or the underlying philosophy, of our compensation programs encourage excessive or inappropriate risk taking.

We structure the compensation to our executive officers to consist of both fixed and variable compensation. The fixed portion (base salary) of compensation is designed to provide a base level of income regardless of our financial or share price performance. The variable portion of compensation (annual incentive cash bonus and long-term equity) is designed to encourage and reward both short- and long-term financial, operational and individual performance, with appropriate caps on the maximum amount of annual cash incentive compensation and shares and/or units that can be earned.

45

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K, and, based on such review and discussions, our Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that our Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee

William H. Binnie (Chair)

Cynthia A. Fisher

Scott D. Freeman

Emil W. Henry, Jr.

Tara S. Innes

46

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid to our named executive officers: